Warning!
Rage and vitriol in the following text. Read at your own risk.
Apologies if I have offended anyone but I myself have been offended
and need to vent.
I read
today some responses to the tournament I played in and won in June. I
was a bit miffed at the attitude towards me about the way I won.
First off, I didn’t intend to win, I believed that it was
impossible to plan for 4 way games as I’ve seen multiplayer games
before and seen the way that players can be ganged up upon. That sort
of game can be vicious so I decided I’d be the grey man and just
gather a few points that I could, and hope for the best.
I think
people don’t like it when they realise they didn’t play the
mission properly and someone else did. The tournament had a lot of
points available for bonus things, like bringing in units from
reserve or having an MSU army. I was the ONLY player who used those fully
to my advantage during the tournament. Did I abuse the rules? I don’t
think I abused them anymore than people who brought nigh on
unkillable units to a battlefield where everyone was limited to 1000
points. People just saw the mission as the Relic mission and thought:
“if I get the relic I win”. Wrong. Whoever gets the most points
wins. People claimed I had a “technical win”, I dispute this,
nowhere in the rules did it say you must claim the relic to win, so a
win is a win. I worked my arse off for 2 weeks painting my army to
get just 2 bonus points, why don’t I deserve to win?
As has
been repeated ad infinitum on the internet about how to win at 40k
(or anything in life really); play the mission. The mission of the
day was to get the most points to win the tournament. The relic was
worth 20 points to whoever had it at the end. There were 2 games to
play ergo 40 possible points. There were 3 other players all trying
to get the relic too, making you a bit target if you tried to get it.
2 points were available for each kill point. Because of these facts I
decided to plan my army around not claiming the relic and aiming to
come somewhere near the high end of the middle, hopefully 3rd
if I was lucky. I planned to get lots of points for my army list as
these were guaranteed points and I wanted the 3 bonus championship
points for getting the most achievements for the day. To be honest I
expected more people to see these as easy points. In fact people were
blinded by the relic and decided to put in really tough big units
instead. This lead to armies with few units, which meant few bonus
points, which in turn put me at an advantage. I just turtled up in
the corner while everyone was frothing over the relic.
Is
maximising your points with your army list or by keeping things in
reserve exploiting the rules? It’s a tournament! Tournaments are
about maximising what you can. If you decided to ignore some obvious
advantages for moral reasons then fair play to you but don’t expect
to win. Tournaments are the peak of WAAC playing, its like that in
every sport and most people congratulate the winner at the end and
try to think what they could have done better. I try to think what I
could have done better after a tournament and the bonus points are
what I have seen used to win before…… by Ken. It was his example
last year that lead me to use the bonus points myself. He played for
all the little things like a bonus point for infiltrating, a bonus
point for having allies, a bonus points for scout moves. People just
dislike the fact that I gained lots more bonus points than anyone
before. Maybe the rules should be changed to have more focus on the
objective of the game but that doesn’t change the rules for the
games already played.
At the end
of it all it’s just a game of plastic men and nothing to get worked
up about. I’m a bit annoyed at myself for getting worked up like
this already but I had to vent. I mean no ill to the other players
who play in the Guardians of Tyr tournaments, I enjoy the challenge,
that’s why I keep going. I could complain about the cheesy armies
that they use against me but I’m not going to, you expect that sort
of thing at tournaments.
Lessons
learnt:
- Play the mission – all of it, not just the main objective.
- Expect cheese at a tournament – it’s a tournament, not a fluffy/story-based scenario.
- If you post it on the internet it will be seen.
- If you were beaten by someone don’t complain about it unless they cheated. Just up your game next time.
- Ignore the orks at your peril!
Wotcha fella. I completely agree with all of your points, and can only apologise for some of the comments that my cohorts from the Kettering club had posted. I will point out that the comments concerning 'winning by technicality' and 'abuse of the system' were made by people that were not at the tourney so don't have much gravitas.
ReplyDeleteThough I was disappointed not to win, I certainly don't begrudge you - or anyone - their success... I agreed with Barrie's comment that, if I had just concentrated more on killing boyz, rather than on the "big prize" of the Relic, I would have picked up the necessary kill points to have reeled you in.
Barrie reckons that a lot of the guys have me down as "the player to beat" but you're the one I usually keep my eye on (in a completely non-gay way, of course).
Anyhoo, I hope that has gone some way to clearing the air in this regard, and I hope to see you across the field of battle in August... I need to put some distance between us, as you've crept too close for comfort (again, no gay overtones) :)
Ever your nemesis (apparently) Ken
Thanks dude. I don't have any bad feelings about it I just felt the need to vent. Now I'm worried that you'll find ways of getting lots of bonus points now lol. :P
Delete